Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Standard
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Iterations
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Monitor
Service Desk
Analyze
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
MTS
TTCN-3
Standard
Commits
b92878c8
Commit
b92878c8
authored
6 months ago
by
Matthias Simon
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Add SOP for how-to-process-change-request
parent
aa26d046
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#9567
passed
6 months ago
Stage: build
Stage: test
Stage: deploy
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
docs/how-to-process-change-requests.md
+90
-0
90 additions, 0 deletions
docs/how-to-process-change-requests.md
with
90 additions
and
0 deletions
docs/how-to-process-change-requests.md
0 → 100644
+
90
−
0
View file @
b92878c8
# How to process a change request
## Purpose
This SOP outlines the process for handling change requests using GitLab. GitLab
supports a wide range of different workflows. This makes it easy to get lost in
the many planning features and provided tools.
This SOP aims to provide a minimal and
[
Kanban-like
](
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanban_(development
)
) process,
which can be extended and customized once the team is comfortable with the
basics.
When followed correctly:
-
Migration from Mantis to GitLab will be smooth and efficient.
-
Frustration about the new tool will be minimized.
-
You will have a clear understanding of what has been done and what needs to
be done.
When not followed:
-
Inconsistencies in the process may lead to confusion and overwhelm.
## Procedure
**Inputs:**
-
You are signed in to GitLab
-
You have write access to the project
**Steps**
0.
**
Open the
[
developer
board.
](
https://labs.etsi.org/rep/mts/ttcn3/standard/-/boards
)
:
**
You will
see columns for new issues, planned issues, issues in progress, issues ready
for review, issues done, and closed issues. Columns can be minimized to save
space using the arrow in the top right corner of the column.
1.
**New issues:**
All open issues that do not belong to one of the other
list appear here. If you want to work an issue:
-
assign it to yourself by adding your name in the assignee field on the right
-
move it to the To-Do column by dragging it to the right
2.
**Planned issues:**
In this column you'll find all issues that are planned
to be worked on, but not started yet.
If you want to start working on an issue:
-
assign it to yourself, if not already done
-
move it to the work in progress (WIP) column by dragging it to the right
3.
**Issues in progress:**
This column contains all issues that are currently
being worked on. If you are working on an issue, make sure to move it to this
column. If you are done with the issue:
-
move it to the review column by dragging it to the right
-
remove yourself as the assignee
-
you may add reviewers by assigning the issue to them
4.
**Issues ready for review:**
This column contains all issues that are ready
for review. If you are a reviewer assign the issue to yourself. You may add
questions or comments to the issue comment section. If you are done
reviewing move the issue either to the "Done" column or back to the To-Do if
column if further refinement is needed.
5.
**Issues done:**
This column contains all issues that are done, but still
open. The team lead closes the issue by clicking on the "Close issue"
button.
When you close an issue, it is good practice to assign a resolve-label and
a short rationale, if possible. This serves as helpful documentation for
future reference. Following labels are available:
-
**Fixed**
: The issue was implemented as suggested. Most change requests
will have this label. Additional comments are usually not required.
-
**Duplicate**
: If an issue is a duplicate of another request use this
label. Also reference the original issue. This makes it easier to navigate
changes.
-
Use the
**Won't Fix**
label for requests that were rejected. If possible
add a short rationale why the request was rejected, or reference a
decision record. Such documentation becomes valuable, should a request
re-opened. For example as is was with the shorthand assignments (
`i++`
).
-
The label
**By Design**
is used to clarify that the standard is correct
and the issue is not a bug. For example, someone could create a bug-report
that inout-parameters should not require strong-typing, but this is by
design. It avoid issues with references to unions.
6.
**Closed issues:**
Issues that are reviewed and do not need further refinement are moved to the "Done" column
7.
**Use and improve:**
An important part of the process is to continuously
improve the process and refine it where necessary. If you have suggestions
for improvements, please share them.
**Outputs:**
-
You will understand the purpose of the developer board and its columns
-
You will know how to change the status or assigmnent of an issue
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment