Introduced in GitLab 13.2.
Each Sidekiq worker, controller action, or API endpoint
must declare a
feature_category attribute. This attribute maps each
of these to a feature
is done for error budgeting, alert routing, and team attribution.
The list of feature categories can be found in the file
This file is generated from the
data file used in the GitLab Handbook and other GitLab resources.
Occasionally new features will be added to GitLab stages, groups, and
product categories. When this occurs, you can automatically update
config/feature_categories.yml by running
scripts/update-feature-categories. This script will fetch and parse
and generate a new version of the file, which needs to be committed to
currently maintains the
feature_categories.yml file. They will automatically be
notified on Slack when the file becomes outdated.
The declaration uses the
feature_category class method, as shown below.
class SomeScheduledTaskWorker include ApplicationWorker # Declares that this worker is part of the # `continuous_integration` feature category feature_category :continuous_integration # ... end
The feature categories specified using
feature_category should be
not, the specs will fail.
Excluding Sidekiq workers from feature categorization
A few Sidekiq workers, that are used across all features, cannot be mapped to a
single category. These should be declared as such using the
declaration, as shown below:
class SomeCrossCuttingConcernWorker include ApplicationWorker # Declares that this worker does not map to a feature category feature_category_not_owned! # ... end
Specifying feature categories on controller actions can be done using
feature_category class method.
A feature category can be specified on an entire controller using:
class Boards::ListsController < ApplicationController feature_category :kanban_boards end
The feature category can be limited to a list of actions using the second argument:
class DashboardController < ApplicationController feature_category :issue_tracking, [:issues, :issues_calendar] feature_category :code_review, [:merge_requests] end
These forms cannot be mixed: if a controller has more than one category, every single action must be listed.
Excluding controller actions from feature categorization
In the rare case an action cannot be tied to a feature category this
can be done using the
not_owned feature category.
class Admin::LogsController < ApplicationController feature_category :not_owned end
Ensuring feature categories are valid
spec/controllers/every_controller_spec.rb will iterate over all
defined routes, and check the controller to see if a category is
assigned to all actions.
The spec also validates if the used feature categories are known. And if the actions used in configuration still exist as routes.
Grape API endpoints can use the
feature_category class method, like
Rails controllers do:
module API class Issues < ::API::Base feature_category :issue_tracking end end
The second argument can be used to specify feature categories for specific routes:
module API class Users < ::API::Base feature_category :users, ['/users/:id/custom_attributes', '/users/:id/custom_attributes/:key'] end end
Or the feature category can be specified in the action itself:
module API class Users < ::API::Base get ':id', feature_category: :users do end end end
As with Rails controllers, an API class must specify the category for every single action unless the same category is used for every action within that class.