We would favour consistent usage of geosf:contains throughout extensions and also in core, instead of promoting s4abcd:contains to core.
TNO agrees, propose closing.
Agreed that conceptually your first option should be preferred. However, the second option can already now be used....
Interesting point. I'm also not against such a relaxation. I think it would be in line with the broadening of the A from SAREF which originally mea...
closed
issue
#16
"Avoid endorsing the Ontology for Measurements, especially in a specific version"
at
SAREF / saref4agri
closed
issue
#13
"SAREF4AGRI-2. The extension defines restrictions on saref:Device"
at
SAREF / saref4agri
closed
issue
#25
"Documentation: inversion s4agri:hasDeploymentPeriod and s4agri:isDeployedAtSpace"
at
SAREF / saref4agri
closed
issue
#8
"`s4agri:hasID` - see https://labs.etsi.org/rep/saref/saref-portal/-/issues/2"
at
SAREF / saref4agri
-
b89f01ce · Merge branch 'stf-refinement' into 'develop-v2.1.1'
- ... and 1 more commit. Compare e3254163...b89f01ce
Loading
Loading
Info
Member since March 13, 2023