Commit 30e06264 authored by Valerie Aurora's avatar Valerie Aurora
Browse files

Fix numbering of headings

parent 28fe2889
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+14 −14
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ The mitigations that reduce risk by type are:
* Likelihood: ROUT-1, CONF-\*, AUTH-\*, IPV6-\*, CRYPT-\*
* Impact: ROUT-2, ROUT-3, NUTI-\*, DNSL-\*, EISO, TRAF-\*, NPII-\*

### C.4.x TH-UEVU: Unknown exploitable vulnerabilities
### C.4.3 TH-UEVU: Unknown exploitable vulnerabilities

Attacker may use unknown exploitable vulnerabilities in the product implementation to get unauthorized access to product assets.

@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: NPII-\*, LOGG-\*

### C.4.x TH-KEVU: Known exploitable vulnerabilities
### C.4.4 TH-KEVU: Known exploitable vulnerabilities

Attacker may use known exploitable vulnerabilities in the product implementation to get unauthorized access to product assets.

@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ Mitigations for Likelihood:

* High to Low: KEVD, KEVA, (KEVT or SCAN), KEVM, (SUAP or SUAO), VULH

### C.4.x TH-UEAC: Unauthorized endpoint access
### C.4.5 TH-UEAC: Unauthorized endpoint access

Attacker may gain unauthorized access to an endpoint in a manner not under control of the product, exposing product assets.

@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: AUTH-3, AUTH-4, AUTH-5, NPII-1, NPII-2, NPII-4

### C.4.x TH-RDOS: Denial of service on remote data processing
### C.4.6 TH-RDOS: Denial of service on remote data processing

Attacker launches denial of service attack on remote data processing solution.

@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: FDRP, LMEM, FAIR

### C.4.x TH-MITM: Machine-in-the-middle
### C.4.7 TH-MITM: Machine-in-the-middle

Attacker attempts to read or modify traffic by capturing and relaying activity to and from endpoints.

@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: LOGG-\*, NPII-2

### C.4.x TH-LEAK: Sensitive data leaks
### C.4.8 TH-LEAK: Sensitive data leaks

Attacker reads sensitive data sent outside the VPN connection by the product.

@@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: NPII-\*, LOGG-\*

### C.4.x TH-PLAN: Transmitting sensitive data in the clear
### C.4.9 TH-PLAN: Transmitting sensitive data in the clear

Attacker may read sensitive data transmitted without encryption.

@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: CRYPT-\*, SCDL-\*, ROUT-\*, AUTH-\*

### C.4.x TH-UNAA: Unauthorized authentication
### C.4.10 TH-UNAA: Unauthorized authentication

Attacker may attempt to authenticate in an unauthorized manner to get access to product assets.

@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: NPII-\*, AUTH-3, AUTH-4, AUTH-5, LOGG-\*

### C.4.x TH-LDEL: Attacker removes evidence of compromise
### C.4.11 TH-LDEL: Attacker removes evidence of compromise

Attacker may remove evidence of compromise from the endpoint.

@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: NPII-\*

#### C.4.3.4 TH-CONF: Access to assets via configuration errors
### C.4.12 TH-CONF: Access to assets via configuration errors

Attacker may use configuration errors to get unauthorized access to the product assets.

@@ -980,7 +980,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: NPII-\*, AUTH-3, AUTH-4, AUTH-5, LOGG-\*, CDST

### C.4.x TH-META: Data leaks due to metadata and traffic analysis
### C.4.13 TH-META: Data leaks due to metadata and traffic analysis

Attacker may use user metadata such as IP addresses and traffic analysis to gain confidential data.

@@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: TODO

### C.4.x TH-RDPS: RDPS compromise and isolation
### C.4.14 TH-RDPS: RDPS compromise and isolation

Attacker may use compromise or isolation errors in remote data processing system to gain access to product assets.

@@ -1040,7 +1040,7 @@ Mitigations for Impact:

* High to Low: TODO

### C.5.2 Mapping of use cases to risk factors and security profiles
### C.5 Mapping of use cases to risk factors and security profiles

| Use case | Description                 | CFG | AUT | DAT | FUN | ADM | RDP | DNC | COM | SP   |
|----------|-----------------------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|------|
@@ -1057,7 +1057,7 @@ _Table C.5.1 — Use cases mapped to risk factors and security profiles_

Security profiles are an informative resource to the assessor. Each security profile is associated with a collection of levels of risk factors. Security profiles will be mapped to specific mitigations for each security requirements necessary to treat the risk.

### C.6.1 Mapping of security profiles to risk factors
### C.6.2 Mapping of security profiles to risk factors

| Security profile | Description                 | CFG | AUT | DAT | FUN | ADM | RDP | DNC | COM |
|------------------|-----------------------------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|