(from https://labs.etsi.org/rep/saref/saref-portal/-/issues/23) * _use domains/ranges axioms (as constraints if some day we use SHACL) when it's obvious in the local name or the definition of the property --> add that to TS 103 548_ * _in all other cases, prefer local restrictions on classes_ * _prefer `someValuesFrom` over `minCardinality 1`_ * _The definition of the property should be explicit about which class(es) it applies to_ * _In future development of SAREF, we agree it may be valuable to have SHACL shapes defined, but some extra care must be taken to not start a tedious process where we need to maintain / synchronise two formalisms in parallel._ Define domain/ranges for * s4inma:belongsToCategory * s4inma:consistsOfBatch * s4inma:consitsOfItem * s4inma:isCategoryOf * s4inma:needsEquipment Changes have to be performed in the OWL code, TS, diagrams, documentation and tests.