(from https://labs.etsi.org/rep/saref/saref-portal/-/issues/23) * *use domains/ranges axioms (as constraints if some day we use SHACL) when it's obvious in the local name or the definition of the property --> add that to TS 103 548* * *in all other cases, prefer local restrictions on classes* * *prefer* `someValuesFrom` over `minCardinality 1` * *The definition of the property should be explicit about which class(es) it applies to* * *In future development of SAREF, we agree it may be valuable to have SHACL shapes defined, but some extra care must be taken to not start a tedious process where we need to maintain / synchronise two formalisms in parallel.* Define domain/ranges for: * s4city:hasCalculationPeriod * s4city:hasKeyPerformanceIndicator * s4city:involvesFacility * s4city:isAvailableInLanguage * s4city:isKPIOf * s4city:isSubEventOF * s4city:takesPlaceAtFacility * s4city:takesPlaceAtPlace Changes have to be performed in the OWL code, TS, diagrams, documentation and tests.