ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details

ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update
0007053 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Clarification | public | 12-05-2015 09:45 | 04-11-2015 14:16

Reporter | Gyorgy Rethy |
Assigned To |  |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always
Status | closed | Resolution | won't fix |
Platform |  | OS |  | OS Version |
Product Version | v4.7.1 (published 2015-06) |
Target Version | v4.8.1 (published 2016-07) | Fixed in Version | v4.8.1 (published 2016-07) |
Clause Reference(s) | 8.2.1
Source (company - Author) | L.M.Ericsson

Summary | 0007053: More detailed explanation of a module parameter restriction

Description

Current text of restriction b) reads:
"b) Module parameters shall not be of port type, default type or component type."
Though the idea behind is clear, values for these types are allocated by the test system, users sometimes understand the restriction that modulepars shall not be these types _as a whole_.
It is proposed to extend the text to:
"b) Module parameters shall not be of port type, default type or component type and shall not embed fields of these types in any dept."

Steps To Reproduce |
Additional Information |
Tags | No tags attached.
Relationships |
Attached Files |

Issue History
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change
12-05-2015 09:45 | Gyorgy Rethy | New Issue |
12-05-2015 09:46 | Gyorgy Rethy | Project | TTCN-3 Change Requests => Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
12-05-2015 09:47 | Gyorgy Rethy | Product Version | => v4.7.1 (published 2015-06)
12-05-2015 09:47 | Gyorgy Rethy | Target Version | => v4.8.1 (published 2016-07)
12-05-2015 19:37 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Note Added: 0012970 |
13-05-2015 10:43 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0012972 |
13-05-2015 10:43 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | new => closed
13-05-2015 10:43 | Gyorgy Rethy | Resolution | open => won't fix
04-11-2015 14:16 | Gyorgy Rethy | Fixed in Version | => v4.8.1 (published 2016-07)

Notes

(0012970)
Jacob Wieland - Spirent
12-05-2015 19:37

Again, this sounds like the definition of "data type" to me. So, the restriction should just be that their type shall be a data type, I think.

(0012972)
Gyorgy Rethy
13-05-2015 10:43

The CR is withdrawn, instead CR 7055 has been submitted.