ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details

ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update
0006650 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Clarification | public | 07-11-2013 13:22 | 29-11-2013 13:38

Reporter | Jacob Wieland - Spirent |
Assigned To | Ina Schieferdecker |
Priority | high | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed |
Platform |  | OS |  | OS Version |
Product Version |  |
Target Version | v4.6.1 (published 2014-06) | Fixed in Version | v4.6.1 (published 2014-06) |
Clause Reference(s) | 15.7.
Source (company - Author) |

Summary | 0006650: matching mechanisms which match omit should not be allowed as elements of record of or set of templates
Description | The following restricting NOTEs should be changed into proper restrictions: NOTE 1 and NOTE 2 in 15.7.2 and NOTE in 15.7.4.
Steps To Reproduce |
Additional Information |
Tags | No tags attached.
Relationships |
Attached Files | CR6650.doc (293,376) 28-11-2013 09:48 http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2953&type=bug CR6650_v2.doc (297,472) 29-11-2013 13:37 http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2966&type=bug

Issue History
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change
07-11-2013 13:22 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | New Issue |
07-11-2013 13:22 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Clause Reference(s) | => 15.7.
07-11-2013 13:22 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Source (company - Author) | =>
22-11-2013 15:20 | Gyorgy Rethy | Project | TTCN-3 Change Requests => Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
22-11-2013 15:30 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0011818 |
22-11-2013 15:30 | Gyorgy Rethy | Target Version | => v4.6.1 (published 2014-06)
22-11-2013 15:30 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0011819 |
22-11-2013 15:30 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | => Ina Schieferdecker
22-11-2013 15:30 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | new => assigned
22-11-2013 15:31 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Deleted: 0011818 |
25-11-2013 12:58 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Note Added: 0011824 |
28-11-2013 09:48 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | File Added: CR6650.doc |
28-11-2013 09:50 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Note Added: 0011850 |
28-11-2013 09:52 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Note Added: 0011851 |
28-11-2013 09:52 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Status | assigned => confirmed
29-11-2013 13:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | File Added: CR6650_v2.doc |
29-11-2013 13:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | Note Added: 0011875 |
29-11-2013 13:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | Status | confirmed => resolved
29-11-2013 13:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | Resolution | open => fixed
29-11-2013 13:38 | Ina Schieferdecker | Status | resolved => closed
29-11-2013 13:38 | Ina Schieferdecker | Fixed in Version | => v4.6.1 (published 2014-06)

Notes

(0011819)
Gyorgy Rethy
22-11-2013 15:30

I propose to delete the notes: they are the 3rd place, where those restrictions are defined: 1st in Table 11, than in clause 15.7 and than in Annex B. Restriction a) of 15.7.2 and 15.7.4 refer already to table 11 and to clause B, therefore, in fact, the notes contain no new information (but contain shorter, and thus easier-to-misinterpret text).

(0011824)
Jacob Wieland - Spirent
25-11-2013 12:58

Sorry, but in Table 11, there are only notes and the table is not in a section marked as Restrictions. Therefore, it deviates from the other places that introduce restrictions (and referring to these "restrictions" in other restrictions parts is in my view unfounded).
Also, I have not found any restrictions in this regard in Annex B.
I would vote to move the restrictions from the notes to the right places, i.e. the respective restrictions sections.

(0011850)
Jacob Wieland - Spirent
28-11-2013 09:50

Added restrictions section to 15.7. Restructured Annex B according to the Restrictions/Examples paradigm used in the rest of the document. All restricting sentences are moved to the restrictions sections, new restrictions sections are introduced where missing, examples are moved into the examples sections

(0011851)
Jacob Wieland - Spirent
28-11-2013 09:52

please review

(0011875)
Ina Schieferdecker
29-11-2013 13:37

as proposed with editorials in v2