ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details

ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update
0004944 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Editorial | public | 05-03-2009 16:57 | 01-07-2009 15:41

Reporter | Elena de Vega |
Assigned To | Ina Schieferdecker |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed |
Platform |  | OS |  | OS Version |
Product Version | v3.4.1 (published 2008-09) |
Target Version | v4.2.1 (published 2010-07) | Fixed in Version | v4.2.1 (published 2010-07) |
Clause Reference(s) | field record
Source (company - Author) | MTP - Elena de Vega

Summary | 0004944: position index of field record type

Description

In the core language document B.1.1 there is an example of a record type where the last field is an array.
type record MyMessageType
{
integer field1,
charstring field2,
boolean field3 optional,
integer[4] field4
}
The position index is located after the field type, although in the grammar, this index is located after the field identifier.
StructFieldDef ::= (Type | NestedTypeDef) StructFieldIdentifier [ArrayDef] [SubTypeSpec] [OptionalKeyword]
If the right position is after the field identifier then the example has to be changed, if not it would be the grammar the one to change.

Steps To Reproduce |
Additional Information |
Tags | No tags attached.
Relationships |

Attached Files

CR4944_resolution_part-1.doc (137,728) 21-04-2009 09:32
http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2092&type=bug
CR4944_resolution_part-1 v2.doc (130,048) 22-04-2009 19:34
http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2113&type=bug
CR4944_resolution_part-1 v3.doc (131,072) 01-07-2009 15:40
http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2150&type=bug

Issue History
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change
05-03-2009 16:57 | Elena de Vega | New Issue |
05-03-2009 16:57 | Elena de Vega | Status | new => assigned
05-03-2009 16:57 | Elena de Vega | Assigned To | => Ina Schieferdecker
05-03-2009 16:57 | Elena de Vega | Clause Reference(s) | => field record
05-03-2009 16:57 | Elena de Vega | Source (company - Author) | => MTP - Elena de Vega
10-03-2009 10:21 | Ina Schieferdecker | Target Version | => Edition 4.2.1 (not yet published)
20-04-2009 11:51 | Ina Schieferdecker | Assigned To | Ina Schieferdecker => Gyorgy Rethy
20-04-2009 17:46 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0008516 |
20-04-2009 18:17 | Elena de Vega | Note Added: 0008517 |
21-04-2009 09:28 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Edited: 0008516 |
21-04-2009 09:32 | Gyorgy Rethy | File Added: CR4944_resolution_part-1.doc |
21-04-2009 09:33 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Edited: 0008516 |
22-04-2009 19:34 | Gyorgy Rethy | File Added: CR4944_resolution_part-1 v2.doc |
22-04-2009 19:36 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0008549 |
22-04-2009 19:36 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | Gyorgy Rethy => Ina Schieferdecker
22-04-2009 19:36 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | assigned => resolved
22-04-2009 19:36 | Gyorgy Rethy | Resolution | open => fixed
01-07-2009 15:39 | Ina Schieferdecker | Note Added: 0008811 |
01-07-2009 15:40 | Ina Schieferdecker | File Added: CR4944_resolution_part-1 v3.doc |
01-07-2009 15:41 | Ina Schieferdecker | Status | resolved => closed
01-07-2009 15:41 | Ina Schieferdecker | Fixed in Version | => Edition 4.2.1 (not yet published)

Notes

(0008516)
Gyorgy Rethy
20-04-2009 17:46 (edited on: 21-04-2009 09:33)

The example has to be corrected. See the attached file CR4944_resolution_part-1.doc. Elena, pls. note, this is not the decision, just my proposal from the analysis

(0008517)
Elena de Vega
20-04-2009 18:17

Hi Gyorgy, You have forgoten to attach the file. Thanks

(0008549)
Gyorgy Rethy
22-04-2009 19:36

STF decision: correct the example. See CR4944_resolution_part-1 v2.doc

(0008811)
Ina Schieferdecker
01-07-2009 15:39

As proposed except of the optional keyword for field4 which is not needed. See v3.