ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details

ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update
0007137 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Technical | public | 11-08-2015 14:53 | 14-12-2015 11:29

Reporter | Tomas Urban |
Assigned To | Gyorgy Rethy |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed |
Platform |  | OS |  | OS Version |
Product Version | v4.7.1 (published 2015-06) |
Target Version | v4.8.1 (published 2016-07) | Fixed in Version | v4.8.1 (published 2016-07) |
Clause Reference(s) | 6.2
Source (company - Author) | STF 487

Summary | 0007137: Uniqueness of items in assignment notation

Description

The current specification doesn't say whether the identifiers used in the assignment notation for records, sets, records-of, sets-of and arrays shall be unique or not.
My impression is that it is allowed (because it doesn't seem to be forbidden), but it would be good to state that explicitly and describe the guidelines for this situation.
However, maybe it would be a better and simpler to forbid using the same field reference inside the assignment notation more than once.

Steps To Reproduce |
Additional Information |
Tags | technically agreed
Relationships |
Attached Files | CR7137_resolution_v1.docx (77,661) 23-09-2015 10:01 http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=3264&type=bug CR7137_resolution_v2.docx (78,398) 23-09-2015 12:35 http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=3270&type=bug

Issue History
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change
11-08-2015 14:53 | Tomas Urban | New Issue |
21-09-2015 10:27 | Gyorgy Rethy | Target Version | => v4.8.1 (published 2016-07)
21-09-2015 15:04 | Gyorgy Rethy | Tag Attached: technically agreed |
21-09-2015 15:05 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0013215 |
22-09-2015 16:22 | Axel Rennoch | Assigned To | => Axel Rennoch
22-09-2015 16:22 | Axel Rennoch | Status | new => assigned
23-09-2015 10:01 | Axel Rennoch | File Added: CR7137_resolution_v1.docx |
23-09-2015 10:01 | Axel Rennoch | Note Added: 0013249 |
23-09-2015 10:01 | Axel Rennoch | Assigned To | Axel Rennoch => Jacob Wieland - Spirent
23-09-2015 10:01 | Axel Rennoch | Status | assigned => confirmed
23-09-2015 12:35 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | File Added: CR7137_resolution_v2.docx |
23-09-2015 12:36 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Note Added: 0013262 |
23-09-2015 12:37 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Status | confirmed => assigned
23-09-2015 12:37 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Note Added: 0013263 |
23-09-2015 12:37 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Assigned To | Jacob Wieland - Spirent => Gyorgy Rethy
23-09-2015 12:37 | Jacob Wieland - Spirent | Status | assigned => confirmed
03-11-2015 13:12 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | confirmed => resolved
03-11-2015 13:12 | Gyorgy Rethy | Fixed in Version | => v4.8.1 (published 2016-07)
03-11-2015 13:12 | Gyorgy Rethy | Resolution | open => fixed
14-12-2015 11:29 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0013612 |
14-12-2015 11:29 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | resolved => closed

Notes

(0013215)
Gyorgy Rethy
21-09-2015 15:05

STF discussion: this is an error; field name shall be only once (like in value list notation the number of values shall not be more than the number of fields)

(0013249)
Axel Rennoch
23-09-2015 10:01

Please check the resolution.

(0013262)
Jacob Wieland - Spirent
23-09-2015 12:36

made statement about index-notation more precise (uniqueness of indices and conformity to index range)

(0013263)
Jacob Wieland - Spirent
23-09-2015 12:37

please review and resolve

(0013612)
Gyorgy Rethy
14-12-2015 11:29

Added to draft V4.7.4