ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details

ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update
0005988 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Clarification | public | 17-12-2011 06:35 | 10-08-2012 11:48

Reporter | Andras Kovacs |
Assigned To | Ina Schieferdecker |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed |
Platform |  | OS |  | OS Version |
Product Version | v4.3.1 (published 2011-06) |
Target Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) | Fixed in Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) |
Clause Reference(s) | Core language / section 27.7
Source (company - Author) | STF433

Summary | 0005988: Scope definition of explicit/implicit omit is poorly phrased in section 27.7
Description | The scope of explicit/implicit omit is defined as follows: 'all optional fields, which have not been defined in the definition the attribute is associated with'. This sentence is hard to understand, perhaps a better phrasing would be: 'all optional fields, that have no assigned value definition in the statement on which the attribute operates'.
Steps To Reproduce |
Additional Information |
Tags | No tags attached.
Relationships |
Attached Files |

Issue History
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change
17-12-2011 06:35 | Andras Kovacs | New Issue |
17-12-2011 06:35 | Andras Kovacs | Clause Reference(s) | => Core language / section 27.7
17-12-2011 06:35 | Andras Kovacs | Source (company - Author) | => STF433
10-07-2012 14:21 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0010762 |
10-07-2012 14:21 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | => Jens Grabowski
10-07-2012 14:21 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | new => assigned
10-07-2012 14:21 | Gyorgy Rethy | Target Version | => Edition 4.5.1
11-07-2012 12:04 | Jens Grabowski | Note Added: 0010834 |
11-07-2012 12:04 | Jens Grabowski | Assigned To | Jens Grabowski => Gyorgy Rethy
12-07-2012 09:55 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0010860 |
12-07-2012 09:55 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | Gyorgy Rethy => Jens Grabowski
09-08-2012 15:24 | Jens Grabowski | Note Added: 0011011 |
09-08-2012 15:25 | Jens Grabowski | Assigned To | Jens Grabowski => Tomas Urban
09-08-2012 17:15 | Tomas Urban | Note Added: 0011012 |
09-08-2012 17:15 | Tomas Urban | Assigned To | Tomas Urban => Ina Schieferdecker
10-08-2012 11:48 | Ina Schieferdecker | Note Added: 0011026 |
10-08-2012 11:48 | Ina Schieferdecker | Status | assigned => closed
10-08-2012 11:48 | Ina Schieferdecker | Resolution | open => fixed
10-08-2012 11:48 | Ina Schieferdecker | Fixed in Version | => Edition 4.5.1

Notes

(0010762)
Gyorgy Rethy
10-07-2012 14:21

STF discussion 2012-07-10: wording to be checked

(0010834)
Jens Grabowski
11-07-2012 12:04

I am fine with the proposal. Assigned to GyÃ¶rgy for crosschecking.

(0010860)
Gyorgy Rethy
12-07-2012 09:55

Actually, the proposed text would mean that all optional fields not changed by a modified template should be implicitly omitted. This is not our intention. Also, the wording "value assignment" excludes matching mechanisms, template references etc.
I propose another way
"all optional fields that remain uninitialized after executing the field assignments of the statement on which the attribute operates"

(0011011)
Jens Grabowski
09-08-2012 15:24

GyÃ¶rgy's proposal is OK with me. Tomas, can you also crosscheck. Assigned to Tomas.

(0011012)
Tomas Urban
09-08-2012 17:15

I agree with the text GyÃ¶rgy proposed. Assigned to Ina for implementation.

(0011026)
Ina Schieferdecker
10-08-2012 11:48

as proposed