ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details

ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update
0006241 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Editorial | public | 01-08-2012 10:16 | 10-08-2012 11:28

Reporter | Tomas Urban |
Assigned To | Ina Schieferdecker |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed |
Platform |  | OS |  | OS Version |
Product Version |  |
Target Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) | Fixed in Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) |
Clause Reference(s) | A.1.6.1.3
Source (company - Author) | Elvior

Summary | 0006241: FieldSpec rule in the BNF
Description | The BNF rule 95 (FieldSpec) currently doesn't contain an option for leaving fields explicitely unspecified (described in the chapter 6.2). Therefore I propose to change the rule from: 95.FieldSpec ::= FieldReference AssignmentChar TemplateBody to 95.FieldSpec ::= FieldReference AssignmentChar (TemplateBody | Minus)
Steps To Reproduce |
Additional Information |
Tags | No tags attached.
Relationships |
Attached Files |

Issue History
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change
01-08-2012 10:16 | Tomas Urban | New Issue |
01-08-2012 10:16 | Tomas Urban | Clause Reference(s) | => A.1.6.1.3
01-08-2012 10:16 | Tomas Urban | Source (company - Author) | => Elvior
08-08-2012 10:42 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | new => assigned
08-08-2012 10:42 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | => Ina Schieferdecker
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Note Added: 0011022 |
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Status | assigned => closed
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Resolution | open => fixed
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Fixed in Version | => Edition 4.5.1
10-08-2012 11:28 | Ina Schieferdecker | Target Version | => Edition 4.5.1

Notes

(0011022)
Ina Schieferdecker
10-08-2012 11:28

as proposed