ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details

ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update
0006159 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Clarification | public | 04-07-2012 13:27 | 11-07-2012 15:37

Reporter | Tomas Urban |
Assigned To | Ina Schieferdecker |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed |
Platform |  | OS |  | OS Version |
Product Version | v4.3.2 (interim 2011) |
Target Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) | Fixed in Version | v4.5.1 (published 2013-04) |
Clause Reference(s) | 15.6.2
Source (company - Author) |

Summary | 0006159: Name of the chapter 15.6.2

Description

The rules in the chapter 15.6.2 are generally applicable to union and anytype fields. However, the chapter doesn't explicitely mention these types. I suggest to add these types to the chapter caption (-> 15.6.2 Referencing record, set, union and anytype fields) and to add several related examples, e.g.:
type union U
{
integer variant1,
integer variant2
}
:
var template U vt_U;
var template anytype vt_any;
var template integer vt_i;
vt_U := ?;
vt_i := vt_U.variant1; // after the assignment vt_i will be AnyValue(?)
vt_any := ?;
vt_i := vt_any.integer; // after the assignment vt_i will be AnyValue(?)

Steps To Reproduce |
Additional Information |
Tags | No tags attached.
Relationships |
Attached Files | CR_6159.docx (50,986) 11-07-2012 10:52 http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2665&type=bug CR_6159_resolution_v2.docx (39,727) 11-07-2012 11:42 http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2669&type=bug CR_6159_resolution_v3.docx (50,836) 11-07-2012 15:36 http://oldforge.etsi.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=2674&type=bug

Issue History
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change
04-07-2012 13:27 | Tomas Urban | New Issue |
04-07-2012 13:27 | Tomas Urban | Clause Reference(s) | => 15.6.2
04-07-2012 13:27 | Tomas Urban | Source (company - Author) | =>
10-07-2012 09:57 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0010736 |
10-07-2012 09:57 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | new => assigned
10-07-2012 09:57 | Gyorgy Rethy | Target Version | => Edition 4.5.1
10-07-2012 09:59 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | => Tomas Urban
11-07-2012 10:52 | Tomas Urban | File Added: CR_6159.docx |
11-07-2012 10:54 | Tomas Urban | Note Added: 0010821 |
11-07-2012 10:55 | Tomas Urban | Assigned To | Tomas Urban => Gyorgy Rethy
11-07-2012 11:42 | Gyorgy Rethy | File Added: CR_6159_resolution_v2.docx |
11-07-2012 11:44 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0010833 |
11-07-2012 11:45 | Gyorgy Rethy | Assigned To | Gyorgy Rethy => Ina Schieferdecker
11-07-2012 15:19 | Ina Schieferdecker | File Added: CR_6159_resolution_v3.docx |
11-07-2012 15:36 | Ina Schieferdecker | File Deleted: CR_6159_resolution_v3.docx |
11-07-2012 15:36 | Ina Schieferdecker | File Added: CR_6159_resolution_v3.docx |
11-07-2012 15:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | Status | assigned => resolved
11-07-2012 15:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | Resolution | open => fixed
11-07-2012 15:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | Note Added: 0010838 |
11-07-2012 15:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | Status | resolved => closed
11-07-2012 15:37 | Ina Schieferdecker | Fixed in Version | => Edition 4.5.1

Notes

(0010736)
Gyorgy Rethy
10-07-2012 09:57

STF discussion 2012-07-10: proposal agreed; rule for the case when an unselected choice is referenced to be added to clause 6.2.5.1.

(0010821)
Tomas Urban
11-07-2012 10:54

Changed as agreed. I slightly modified 6.2.6 (the anytype) too.

(0010833)
Gyorgy Rethy
11-07-2012 11:44

Technically OK, just a few words changed to align it to the wording generally used in the standard. See text in CR_6159_resolution_v2.docx. Can be implemented.

(0010838)
Ina Schieferdecker
11-07-2012 15:37

Implemented as in v3