ETSI's Bug Tracker - Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language
View Issue Details

ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update
0005917 | Part 01: TTCN-3 Core Language | Editorial | public | 15-07-2011 15:44 | 27-09-2011 11:41

Reporter | Gyorgy Rethy |
Assigned To |  |
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required |
Platform |  | OS |  | OS Version |
Product Version |  |
Target Version | v4.4.1 (published 2012-04) | Fixed in Version | v4.4.1 (published 2012-04) |
Clause Reference(s) | 27.7
Source (company - Author) | L.M.Ericsson

Summary | 0005917: Wrong example in clause 27.7

Description

The example is:
template MyRecord2 MyTemplate23 := {} with {optional "implicit omit"}
// same as MyTemplate2a, m remains undefined
while MyTemplate23 cannot be the same as MyTemplate2a, as doesn't have an implicit omit attribute. The example should be:
template MyRecord2 MyTemplate23 := {} with {optional "implicit omit"}
// the content of the template is { m:= {a:=<uninitialized>, b:=omit}}

Steps To Reproduce |
Additional Information |
Tags | No tags attached.
Relationships |
Attached Files |

Issue History
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change
15-07-2011 15:44 | Gyorgy Rethy | New Issue |
15-07-2011 15:44 | Gyorgy Rethy | Clause Reference(s) | => 27.7
15-07-2011 15:44 | Gyorgy Rethy | Source (company - Author) | => L.M.Ericsson
27-09-2011 11:41 | Gyorgy Rethy | Note Added: 0010242 |
27-09-2011 11:41 | Gyorgy Rethy | Status | new => closed
27-09-2011 11:41 | Gyorgy Rethy | Resolution | open => no change required
27-09-2011 11:41 | Gyorgy Rethy | Fixed in Version | => Edition 4.4.1
27-09-2011 11:41 | Gyorgy Rethy | Target Version | => Edition 4.4.1

Notes

(0010242)
Gyorgy Rethy
27-09-2011 11:41

Record2 has a single mandatory field only, where implicit omit doesn't have effect.