potential for confusion regarding relationship between subclauses (subclause 11.5.2.3)

REFERENCE: subclause 11.5.2.3, Use of accessibility services (recommendation)

The relationship between subclauses 11.5.2.3 and 11.5.2.10, Text, is potentially unclear. Given that the services in 11.5.2.3 are now recommendations, and 11.5.2.10 requires their use, would a lack of implementation in 11.5.2.3 still satisfy 11.5.2.10? Additionally, do the requirements in 11.5.2.5 to 11.5.2.17 effectively mandate the services from 11.5.2.3?

PROPOSED CHANGES

• Remove "(Recommendation)" from the heading of clause 11.5.2.3
• Change "the software should use" to "the software shall use" to reflect that it is a requirement.