potential confusion regarding "industry standard connections" (subclause 5.1.2.2)

REFERENCE: subclause 5.1.2.2,Assistive technology and closed functionality

This clause does not have a note like the one in 5.1.3.2, “industry standard connection could be a wireless connection”, which can mislead readers to think it doesn’t apply to this clause, too.

PROPOSED CHANGE

Maintain the same comment in 5.1.2.2 and 5.1.3.2 to clarify that wireless connections are in scope of both these clauses, possibly also using the note in 8.1.2 to clarify the word “connection."